On September 15, 2022, GOL Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A. (GOL), Brazil’s second largest domestic airline, resolved long-running parallel investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The São Paulo-based company, whose shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, consented to a cease-and-desist order with the SEC finding that it violated the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with DOJ to settle criminal charges for conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery and books and records provisions of the FCPA. The company will collectively pay $41.5 million in fines to the federal agencies and pay an additional $3.4 million in penalties and restitution to Brazilian authorities.
According to court records, the bribery scheme took place between 2012 and 2013 and was spearheaded by a member of GOL’s board of directors. As part of the corrupt scheme, GOL paid $3.8 million to high-ranking Brazilian government officials to secure the passage of legislation that allowed GOL and other airlines to pay significantly less tax on revenues—between 1% to 3% tax—rather than a standard 20% tax. To pay these bribes, the director caused the company to enter into sham contracts with entities tied to the Brazilian officials. Each bribe was disguised as a legitimate expense on GOL’s books and, in all, GOL wrongfully obtained a tax savings of $39.7 million. The scheme itself had tangential jurisdictional links to the United States, including that a United States based messaging platform was used to transmit ephemeral messages using United States located servers, that a bribe was paid from a Bahamas incorporated company through the United States to a Swiss bank account, and that GOL made a SEC filing that falsely reported the bribe payments as sales and marketing expenses.
In the SEC press release announcing the resolution, the SEC’s FCPA Unit Chief, Charles Cain, described GOL’s internal accounting controls as being “particularly ineffective” and stated that the case “highlights the need for internal accounting controls that are effective for transactions initiated at all levels of an organization.” The SEC order underscored the company’s lack of proper controls, noting that the company’s procurement process was one that relied primarily on the GOL director for authorization and verification of certain services with little oversight or review. GOL’s internal accounting controls were also not adequately designed to reflect its corporate policy against making improper payments to government officials.
GOL reached resolutions with the agencies based on extensive cooperation with the agencies’ investigations, which included providing the facts obtained through the company’s internal investigation in a timely fashion, translating documents, testing thousands of transactions, and making current management widely available to the agencies, including individuals who needed to travel to the United States from abroad.
The company also promptly engaged in remedial measures by redesigning its company anti-corruption program, conducting a comprehensive risk assessment, creating a risk and compliance department, hiring a new chief compliance officer, and terminating its relationships with third parties that were involved in the misconduct. Notably though, GOL does not appear to have self-reported the misconduct and was still able to negotiate a DPA.
Despite the apparent lack of self-reporting, because of the company’s prompt remediation, DOJ did not impose an independent monitor as part of the DPA. However, to ensure GOL’s continued commitment to enhancing its compliance program, the DPA does require GOL’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Compliance Officer to certify at the end of the DPA term that its “compliance program is reasonably designed to detect and prevent violations of the [FCPA] and other applicable anti-corruption laws throughout the Company’s operations.”
These parallel enforcement actions serve as a reminder that companies must continue to invest in and implement robust, tailored, and effective compliance programs. Fostering a culture of compliance in which all employees understand the importance of compliance and how to fulfill regulatory obligations is vital for mitigating bribery and corruption risks.
About McGuireWoods’ Government Investigations & White Collar Litigation Department
McGuireWoods’ Government Investigations & White Collar Litigation Department is a nationally recognized team of more than 80 attorneys representing Fortune 100 and other companies and individuals in civil and criminal investigations and enforcement matters at the federal and state level. The senior team consists of former federal officials, including a former deputy attorney general of the United States, former U.S. attorneys, more than a dozen federal prosecutors and an associate counsel to the president of the United States. Strategically centered in Washington, our Government Investigations & White Collar Litigation Department is recognized as an elite practice, most recently honored by Chambers USA with a highly regarded nationwide ranking for Corporate Crime & Investigations, honored twice as a White Collar Practice Group of the Year by Law360 and consistently ranked among the world’s leading investigations firms in the Global Investigations Review 100 guide to top cross-border investigations practices. The Legal 500 United States, a premier list of the country’s best law firms, also commended McGuireWoods for the “exceptional quality” of its powerhouse white collar litigation practice.
About McGuireWoods’ Anti-Bribery & Anti-Corruption (FCPA) Practice
While many law firms now have experience in corporate integrity, few have counseled companies in connection with the complex range of matters that McGuireWoods has both inside and outside the United States. Our experience has created a high level of credibility and relationships with enforcement decision-makers at the DOJ, SEC, SFO and other key law enforcement and regulatory agencies. Our lawyers regularly conduct internal investigations and defend external investigations across major substantive areas relevant to international trade, including the FCPA, UK Bribery Act, False Claims Act and related qui tam matters, sanctions regulations (OFAC), Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). We conduct internal audits and investigations focused on identifying suspected violations, prepare voluntary self-disclosures for submission to the government and work to negotiate with the government for the best possible result. We represent clients at every stage of these government investigations — from informal inquiries through disciplinary proceedings and appeals. For more details, visit our page here.
About McGuireWoods’ Securities Enforcement and Litigation Team
Our Securities Enforcement and Litigation Team is part of our elite Government Investigations and White-Collar Litigation Department includes members of our nationally-recognized Financial Services Litigation Department and former senior SEC and FINRA enforcement attorneys and litigators, as well as high-level federal prosecutors. For more details, visit our page here