Corporate & Commercial

77006468.jpegIn a decision asserting broad authority for the CFPB and which is certain to set the tone for future CFPB appellate rulings, Bureau director Richard Cordray recently issued the Bureau’s first decision from an appeal of a Bureau administrative enforcement action. The decision, issued June 4, generally affirmed a 2014 Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decision

Icontractn a recent letter, 58 members of Congress asked the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to exercise its rule-making authority and ban mandatory arbitration provisions in consumer financial agreements. In support of their request, the authors cite the CFPB’s March 2015 internal study on arbitration, which the CFPB conducted pursuant to Section 1028

Does the False Claims Act’s antiretaliation provision, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h)(1), apply to an “employer that fire[s] an employee after discovering that the employee was a whistleblower and relator in an ongoing qui tam action under the FCA against his former, unrelated employer”?  Cestra v. Mylan, Inc, No. 14-825, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67069 (W.D.

iStock_000004688619Medium-thumb-225x149-186.jpgThe TILA/RESPA integrated disclosures (TRID) rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act takes effect on August 1, 2015. Once effective, the TRID will drastically alter, among other things, the pre-closing disclosures that creditors, mortgage brokers and settlement agents must provide to borrowers under

Mortgage Loan Agreement

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently released a step-by-step guide titled Your Home Loan Toolkit as part of their Know Before You Owe mortgage initiative designed to improve compliance and help consumers understand mortgage loans. This toolkit will guide potential homeowners in securing mortgages, understanding closing costs and offering helpful hints for consumers to

Government-Regulatory-and-Criminal-Investigations.jpgLast week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged more than 20 individuals and companies with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) related to the buying and selling of investment-grade corporate bonds. The SEC charged the respondents with trading in corporate bonds without first registering as broker-dealers. Two respondents, Global