The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced the nation’s largest settlement involving allegations of drug diversion at a health care system. The settlement, totaling $7,750,000, came after a years-long investigation by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) into McLaren Health Care Corporation (MHCC).  The DEA concluded that MHCC’s handling of controlled substances violated the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), 21 U.S.C. §§ 801–904, and its implementing regulations.  The government alleged that the health care system’s internal practices were deficient and, therefore, allowed for the diversion of drugs, including opioids.

In today’s budget, UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced a £100 million Taskforce to scrutinise claims made under business support schemes designed to help companies and workers navigate their way through the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Taxpayer Protection Taskforce will be examining claims made honestly but in error as well as those made fraudulently.

The UK Government’s package of COVID-19 support schemes are credited with saving millions of jobs and keeping many businesses viable. However, auditors and Members of Parliament have been quick to point out that weak safeguards left the schemes vulnerable to exploitation.

It’s an old lesson in government investigations, but one worth repeating. Conduct during an investigation can matter as much as the conduct under investigation – sometimes even more.

High-profile prosecutions of the past have shown the severe consequences of mistakes in responding to government investigations. Martha Stewart went to prison not for insider trading but for how she responded to an insider trading investigation. Barry Bonds was convicted not for steroid use, but for how he responded to a steroids investigation.

As previously discussed, on April 3, 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a process for inquiries to be submitted to OIG about whether administrative enforcement discretion would be provided for certain arrangements directly connected to the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). OIG established this process to…

In the month since he became Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, David Uejio has implemented a “change of direction” at the agency, making sweeping announcements on a weekly basis.

Read our complete commentary on McGuireWoods’ Consumer FinSights blog, which assesses where the CFPB stands after the Biden administration’s first month and the…

The U.S. Department of Justice announced an indictment in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California against a North Korea-sponsored international cybercriminal organization that infiltrated public and private computer networks, fundamentally compromised these systems, and sought to obtain over a billion dollars from this illicit access.

Read the full article on our…

It was only just over a month ago that President Biden selected David Uejio, a long-time senior leader at the CFPB with a low public profile, to lead the agency temporarily as Acting Director.  But already, Mr. Uejio has made very significant changes at the agency, implementing what he calls a “change of direction” with sweeping announcements on a weekly basis.  Even as the Senate prepares to consider President Biden’s nominee, current FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra, to lead the CFPB for a full term at a March 2 hearing, it is time to assess where the agency stands after the Biden Administration’s first month and the likely changes still to come.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced charges this month against a Michigan woman, Amina Abbas, for embezzling government property.  This indictment is the first in the nation related to the CARES Act public health and social services emergency fund (the Provider Relief Fund), which provides funds to support healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.…

This week, the FBI, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the Department of the Treasury released a joint advisory report on HIDDEN COBRA — the cyber threat North Korea poses to cryptocurrency — and provided mitigation recommendations for addressing this ongoing threat.

Read our full article on our Subject to Inquiry blog for highlights…

For the third time in less than a month, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a major enforcement action against an international cybercriminal organization that infiltrated public and private computer networks, fundamentally compromised these systems, and sought to obtain over a billion dollars from this illicit access. This past week’s indictment, which was obtained by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, is particularly notable in that it: (1) shines a spotlight on the operations of a decade-long effort by a North Korean state sponsored cybercriminal organization to inflict monetary and reputational harm on targeted government agencies and contractors, financial institutions, cryptocurrency platforms, online casinos and entertainment industry companies; and (2) and highlights the broad array of methods utilized by this organization to evade network cybersecurity protections, exploit computer networks, and steal intellectual property and corporate secrets, while also conducting cyber-extortions, ransomware attacks, and cyber-enabled heists of bank-held funds, ATMs, and cryptocurrency. The threat posed by this organization is sufficiently acute that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Department of Treasury (Treasury) simultaneously released a joint advisory addressing one of the organization’s most invasive tools, the Applejeus malware, that has been used to conduct large-scale cyber-intrusions, including in this case.