Earlier this year, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma granted Washington state’s motion to intervene to transfer venue to the Western District of Washington in James Siegel, M.D. v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. Relator Dr. Siegel originally filed suit in Oklahoma on February 2, 2015, alleging violations of the Federal False Claims
Latest from FCA Insider - Page 3
Temporary Allies: Opposing Parties Successfully Sue VA for FCA-related Discovery
A Kansas federal court recently ruled against the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in litigation arising out of a discovery dispute brought by the relator and defendant in a separate, pending FCA action. See Schroeder v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, No. 22-2209-DCC-KGG, 2023 WL 3478052 (D. Kan.). This relatively unique case…
Seventh Circuit Upholds Decision In Favor of Insured Party Seeking Coverage for False Claims Act Settlement

On May 3, 2023, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit sided with the policyholder, resolving a large insurance coverage dispute relating to a $100 million settlement involving claims under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act. Astellas US Holding, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., No. 21-3075, 2023 WL 3221737…
OIG to Expand Informal Guidance with New FAQs

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has announced that it is expanding the topics it considers for new Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) submitted by healthcare stakeholders. OIG will now answer general questions about the Federal anti-kickback statute (AKS), questions related to the civil monetary penalty (CMP) provision prohibiting remuneration to Medicare and State health care…
Pharmaceutical Suppliers Beware: Expect Increased Scrutiny of Average Wholesale Pricing Methodology and Marketing “The Spread”
A Texas federal court recently denied a pharmaceutical supplier’s motion to dismiss claims brought by a whistleblower under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) alleging violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and manipulation of Average Wholesale Pricing (AWP) rules. The complaint was filed by a pharmacist (the Relator) who previously worked for the defendant, Professional…
Distributor of Ophthalmic Surgical Products Found Guilty of Paying Kickbacks and Violating the False Claims Act: May Be Liable For Up To $848 Million in Civil Damages and Penalties
On February 28, 2023, a federal jury in the District of Minnesota found the Cameron-Ehlen Group, d/b/a Precision Lens, and its founder and owner Paul Ehlen (the “Defendants”) guilty of paying kickbacks to ophthalmic surgeons in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729 (“FCA”) and Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b) (“AKS”) between…
CMS Streamlines Stark Law Self-Disclosures
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services recently announced updates to the voluntary self-referral disclosure protocol for reporting and resolving technical violations under the physician self-referral law commonly known as the Stark Law.
Read on for details about these updates, intended to streamline the reporting process and reduce burdens on self-disclosing healthcare providers.
Medicare Accelerated Payment Fraud Leads to Criminal Conviction
Government investigators focus on pandemic-related fraud has culminated in a recent criminal conviction As announced by the Department of Justice (DOJ), on Friday, January 13, 2023, a federal jury convicted a Colorado physician of theft for misappropriating almost $250,000 in federal COVID-19 relief funds, including both the Medicare Accelerated and Advance Payment Program (“MAAPP”)…
DOJ’s False Claims Act Statistics Show Declining Recoveries, Increasing Enforcement
The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced it recovered over $2.2 billion under the False Claims Act in fiscal year 2022 — the lowest annual recovery since 2008. Despite declining recoveries, the number of new matters suggests that investigation activity will remain vigorous and businesses should be prepared for more robust enforcement as promised by…
SCOTUS to Decide if False Claims Act Reaches Defendants Offering Reasonable Interpretation of Vague Requirement
On Jan. 13, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to petitioners in two False Claims Act cases to determine whether the law’s knowledge requirement reaches defendants who can offer an “objectively reasonable” interpretation of an ambiguous legal or contractual requirement material to government payment.
Read on for details about this case, likely…